Hi,

----- On 19 Feb, 2015, at 16:02, Daniel J. Luke [email protected] wrote:
> or we could avoid default variants (and maybe go back to having +no_foo 
> variants
> for the corner cases where someone wants to build with less functionality if
> necessary).

that sounds like a step backwards, especially since the proposed solution isn't
all that hard to implement, but switching to +no_foo requires adjusting 
thousands
of Portfiles.

-- 
Clemens Lang
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to