On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Andrea D'Amore <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10 March 2015 at 13:50, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: >> For future reference, since this does not change the way that the port >> installs by default, the revision should not have been increased. > > I stood by the rule to bump revision if installed files changed, > regardless if the change affected default install or not. > This actually makes more sense, duly noted.
Even if the new variant would become default, there would be no need for a revbump. The criteria is that files change, but the package signature doesn't. Mojca _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
