Hi René, On 14 Mar 2015, at 16:15 , René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2) Does it make sense to introduce a _metaport_, which depends on kdelibs4, >> qtcurve and kde4-workspace and which all other KDE ports should in turn >> depend on - instead of directly depending on kdelibs4? > > That would be the best option IMHO, and one might even argue that > kde4-workspace could be such a meta-port.
well, true. > Add kde4-baseapps, kde4-runtime and QtCurve as a replacement for the buggy > Oxygen theme and you're close to what one might indeed call a KDE4 workspace > on OS X. I guess all that is a good idea, although it’s quite a load of dependencies then. > Making all packages depend on this package might be a bit overkill, as this > will be introducing dependencies on things like kdepimlibs and through that > akonadi. Looks like for the sake of a sane environment one has to go this way… Greets, Marko _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
