On Mar 31, 2015, at 1:05 PM, Mojca Miklavec <[email protected]> wrote:
> In my opinion increasing the version of the portgroup should be > reserved for (fundamentally) incompatible changes or when the syntax > changes. This is just changing the question to "what's an 'incompatible' change?". Permitting portgroups to change default portfile behavior en masse is convenient for maintainers, but it's prone to breaking things. > I feel that starting a new revision would introduce way more work than > benefits. Why? We wouldn't have to continue maintaining the old versions, other than to fix serious bugs. vq _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
