Hi, ----- On 14 Apr, 2015, at 18:02, René J.V. Bertin [email protected] wrote:
> Erm, you may have noticed that I've been spending a lot of time working on the > Qt ports, so if those symlinks are created by qt4-mac or qt5-mac they do kind > of relate to my use cases :) I was talking about your use case of symlinking files/, not any of the other use cases you might have. > Would it be better if the port:qtN-mac created an empty directory instead of > that symlink and the style port (QtCurve) created a symlink to the actual > plugin rather than to the plugin directory? No. Do not modify upstream packaging to work around a bug in trace mode. -- Clemens Lang _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
