On 2015-5-4 19:47 , Mojca Miklavec wrote: > [waking the thread from the dead] > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Joshua Root wrote: >> On 2014-7-11 04:52 , Mojca Miklavec wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I would like to ask if there is any chance to make Code::Blocks >>> distributable and what would have to be done. >>> >>>> /opt/local/var/macports/sources/rsync.macports.org/release/tarballs/base/portmgr/jobs/port_binary_distributable.tcl >>>> -v codeblocks >>> >>> "codeblocks" is not distributable because its license "gpl" conflicts >>> with license "OpenSSL" of dependency "openssl" >>> >>> Codeblocks depends on boost which further depends on openssl. >> >> Not quite, boost depends on python27 which depends on openssl. >> >> Check if codeblocks is linked against the boost libs that use python, >> and also check if the boost python libs use any of python's SSL-using >> modules. If not, you can add 'license_noconflict boost' to codeblocks. > > I'm probably blind, but I'm unable to find *any* library that would > even link against boost. > > The headers are used in NassiShneiderman, but > otool -L /opt/local/lib/codeblocks/plugins/libNassiShneiderman.so > doesn't shouw any link against boost. I also don't see anything trying > to link against boost in Makefiles. > > Just > if test "x$BUILD_NASSISHNEIDERMAN_TRUE" = "x" ; then > AC_LANG_PUSH([C++]) > > AC_CHECK_HEADER([boost/spirit/include/classic.hpp],[],[AC_MSG_ERROR([...])]) > AC_LANG_POP([C++]) > fi > > I'll add 'license_noconflict boost' like you suggested.
Including the headers is the equivalent of copying them into the program. It quite likely makes the resulting binary a derivative work of boost, and thus subject to its license. - Josh _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
