> On May 18, 2015, at 5:11 PM, Craig Treleaven <[email protected]> wrote:
> At 11:56 AM -0400 5/18/15, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Craig Treleaven 
>> <<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote:
>> ...
>> OTOH, someone posted some information several weeks ago explaining how to 
>> determine if that licence conflict really applies or not. (Involves 
>> inspecting library linkages, as I recall.)  I get the impression that our 
>> current policy is quite conservative and that a number of packages (many?) 
>> may actually qualify for binary distribution with some analysis and 
>> verification.
>> 
>> But someone needs to put in that time --- and time is always a problem in a 
>> volunteer-run project.
> 
> Understood, I'm trying to gauge whether there is interest in taking MacPorts 
> in this direction.  Right now, as I see it, MacPorts is pretty much geared to 
> coders and sophisticated users (system/network administrators, etc).  There 
> exists a wider group of folks who just want to run a specific application or 
> two (say Darktable and Gimp, just for instance).  If such users could just 
> install "Pallet-lite" and then be able to install any of a few dozen major 
> open-source applications, that might be pretty popular.
> 
> In some ways, it might be the Mac App Store for open source.

we essentially have had that at different times in the past - there was an old 
branch that pushed the build products into rpms and did install only from rpms 
too (so MacPorts was just a build system and didn’t have to do any of the 
package management stuff).

as a project, we need to decide if we want to extend MacPorts to make it less 
of an 80% package-manager solution (and if so, who is going to work on it?) or 
if it makes sense to once again look to leverage another project (just pick a 
package manager and have macports feed into it).

--
Daniel J. Luke                                                                  
 
+========================================================+                      
  
| *---------------- [email protected] ----------------* |                      
    
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |                      
    
+========================================================+                      
  
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |                      
    
|          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |                      
    
+========================================================+



_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to