On Jun 23, 2015, at 4:30 PM, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Jun 23, 2015, at 11:20 AM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: >> >>>> So those modules would just include python-1.0 before github-1.0. >>> >>> That would be horribly confusing even for me. >> >> I think discussing this makes it sound more complex than it will be in >> practice. > > I have to agree with Mojca here. If order of inclusion of portgroups is > important, that's confusing, especially if the required order is not > alphabetical. We do seem to have a compulsion to alphabetize things like > portgroup inclusion, dependencies, configure args, etc., under the assumption > that order doesn't matter. That is true. > Of course I understand that MacPorts will run the portgroup code in the order > specified in the portfile, but we should try to structure portgroup so that > the order of inclusion doesn't matter. Sometimes that is difficult to do. Yes, that would be best of course. In any case, I haven't played with possible implementations yet. vq _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
