On Jul 5, 2015, at 12:12 AM, Mihai Moldovan wrote: > On 05.07.2015 05:48 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> Could you be more specific about why a revbump of octave-control was needed? >> I understand a revbump of octave was needed following the updates to the >> gcc48 and gcc49 ports, but how does that translate into requiring >> octave-control to be revbumped? > > [17:40:49] < mschamschula> Ionic: If I revbump octave and then uninstall the > old > gcc version octave-control will not be the wiser, as it was linked against the > old library
octave doesn't contain any static libraries, so we're talking about a dynamic library... wouldn't octave-control then simply use the newer octave dynamic library when octave is updated? _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
