Le 19/09/2015 13:16, Andrew L. Moore a écrit : > Guys, > Macports appears to install qt5-mac, llvm-3.5 and llvm-3.7 wholesale under > libexec. This is not a traditional destination. Is there a reason for > choosing libexec over lib? >
Hi, In the Linux world, libexec is an optional directory in the File System Hierarchy standard: http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs/ch04s07.html lib can also be used for the same purpose: http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs/ch04s06.html Debian and derivates only uses lib. I believe Red Hat et al. use libexec. So it's purely a matter of personal choice and project policy. I personally don't like libexec much. Unless the project decides on one over the other, I'd tend to use whatever upstream uses for each port. Kind regards, Thibaut. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
