How about this: * If the checksums specified in the Portfile include sha256, just print out the actual values for those checksum types.
* If not, add sha256 to the list when printing out the actual values. After all there's no harm in using weak hashes in addition to good ones. - Josh On 2015-10-12 07:02 , Joshua Root wrote: > Yes, and I seem to remember having this conversation once before... :) > > On 2015-10-12 05:06 , Daniel J. Luke wrote: >> it’s really useful for the case when upstream publishes a checksum (that’s >> not one of our default ‘good’ ones) when the output includes the checksums >> that are in the portfile. >> >>> On Oct 11, 2015, at 1:34 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>> Use $default_checksum_types for handy copy/paste output on checksum failure >>> >>> This should help adoption of better, more robust hashing algorithms. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
