Hi Ryan, The +testing variant of revision 2 is equivalent to no variant at revision 1. So, yes it does have an effect, of removing quite a lot of installed files that are unnecessary except for when testing.
David On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Ryan Schmidt <ryandes...@macports.org> wrote: > > > On Jun 10, 2016, at 12:31 PM, dstru...@macports.org wrote: > > > > Revision > > 149308 > > Author > > dstru...@macports.org > > Date > > 2016-06-10 10:31:56 -0700 (Fri, 10 Jun 2016) > > Log Message > > > > paraview: Previous commit (because of +testing) should have increased > revision. > > > --- trunk/dports/science/paraview/Portfile 2016-06-10 15:00:52 UTC > (rev 149307) > > +++ trunk/dports/science/paraview/Portfile 2016-06-10 17:31:56 UTC > (rev 149308) > > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ > > > > name paraview > > version 5.0.1 > > -revision 1 > > +revision 2 > > Since the +testing variant added by the previous commit was not a default > variant, forcing users to rebuild will do nothing; the revision should not > have been increased (but don't change it back now). > > >
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
