On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth.at.macpo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia > <jerem...@apple.com> wrote: >> >>> On Oct 9, 2016, at 09:47, Jack Howarth <howarth.at.macpo...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 3:53 AM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia >>> <jerem...@apple.com> wrote: >>>> thread_local support was added in OS X 10.9 (along with >>>> __cxa_thread_atexit being added to Libc as part of that support). As long >>>> as your minimum deployment target is 10.9, you should be fine. The issue >>>> is that you're on 10.6, so you don't have __cxa_thread_atexit. >>>> >>>> There is active conversation right now about adding a fallback >>>> implementation of __cxa_thread_atexit directly into libcxxabi. See >>>> https://reviews.llvm.org/D21803 as that might be quite useful for your >>>> needs. If so, provide a patch to libcxxabi that incorporates it, and I'll >>>> get it in. >>> >>> On the topic of thread local support, the failures in the guile 2.0.x >>> test suite should be looked at... >>> >>> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/52556 >>> >>> to determine if Apple's thread-local-storage implementation is buggy >>> as upstream guile claims. >> >> Radar? > > radar://28688091 "guile 2.0.12 exposes potential thread-local-storage > bug on Mac OS X" > > Note that currently the guile Portfile in MacPorts lacks the support > for 'sudo port -d test guile' to work. >
Also added a Portfile diff to https://trac.macports.org/ticket/52556 to add the missing test support and suppress tls to pass it. >> _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
