> On Oct 20, 2016, at 4:25 PM, René J.V. Bertin <rjvber...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Thursday October 20 2016 15:38:42 Lawrence Velázquez wrote: >> >> Better that than increasing the complexity of base and portfiles. > > Yeah, unless someone proposes to implement something in a portgroup. > Then all of a sudden it becomes base functionality ...
Nonsense. There's plenty of functionality currently implemented in portfiles that would make no sense in base. > I won't be reinventing all kinds of wheels to delay updating > dependency declarations beyond checking for the presence of a token > when the portgroup is being read. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ vq _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
