> On Nov 28, 2016, at 7:41 AM, René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is moot if master is exclusively a testing area for experiments > that may never make it to a release. If it has a more usual role and > is used by those who live on the bleeding edge, then my point stands
All development is done on master. Sufficiently stable features are manually cherry-picked to branches, which are used to make releases. We do not make releases directly from master. Master is generally stable enough to use day-to-day, which many devs do. vq
