On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Mojca Miklavec <[email protected]> wrote:
> You mean not adding it as a runtime dependency (even if having also a > runtime dependency on gcc would be technically correct)? > You're only using that package to bootstrap. If you're worried about e.g. a runtime leaking into the final package, build a stage2 and use it to build the stage3; now the stage2 is the source of your runtime --- but the stage2 should be identical to the stage3 if it is built correctly, and gcc's build checks that, so in fact the stage3 is using its *own* runtime. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates [email protected] [email protected] unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
