Hi, I have an impression that we are now getting pull requests from upstream developers (or some close-to-upstream users/developers) who never contributed to MacPorts earlier and sometimes don't even have MacPorts installed and never test the changes. Some of them submit both to MacPorts and HomeBrew at the same time.
Well, this is both good and bad at the same time. It's good because we are getting code from upstream in a timely matter. It slightly bad because these patches are not tested (even though the software itself might be tested on Mac). Of course the one who commits a pull request is also expected to test the changes, but I would find it helpful if we had a pull request template where submitters could mark whether they: - tested the changes and if so, on which OS versions - ran `port lint` - whether this (a) comes from maintainer, (b) is non-maintainer or doesn't require permission, or (c) requires permission from maintainer; in that case @mention it ... probably more I'm not saying that we should force every singe upstream contributor to do all the possible tests, but it would be at least helpful to know in case they didn't. Mojca (HB has a template with a checklist for example: https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/pulls)
