On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 4:10 AM, René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why yes indeed, but then the question becomes why the umask would > sometimes get set to 0255. Does that sound like a value that base might use > in certain conditions? I never use umask myself, one of those things I > shoot myself in the foot with too easily. There was at least one past bugfix where the code (for "install" of directories, iirc?) was inappropriately using the umask directly. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates [email protected] [email protected] unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
