On Feb 7, 2017, at 02:07, Joshua Root wrote: > On 2017-2-7 08:11 , John Patrick wrote: >> should 'port -v checksum' check all checksum's listed? >> >> just wondering as about to upgrade a port version and it complained >> about the rmd160, I updated rmd160 with the new checksum but not the >> sha512 >> >> if their an option to force it to check all checksum's listed to I >> know the Portfile is valid for the new version? > > 'port checksum' should definitely always check all the checksums listed in > the Portfile and fail if any of them don't match those of the distfile. It > will additionally compute rmd160 and sha256 if those are not listed when it > fails, so you can easily add them. > > As Ryan mentioned, sha512 is not currently supported. If port doesn't > complain when you use it, it probably should.
Yes, there are a couple ports that already have sha512 checksums listed -- apache-ant and jumpcut -- but MacPorts does not check them.
