On 13 Jul 2017, at 21:50, db <iams...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 13 Jul 2017, at 18:08, Joshua Root <j...@macports.org> wrote:
>> Fixed in master: 
>> <https://github.com/macports/macports-base/commit/6c8c70b370753b9015400b27afdcd303b7a0cb63>
> I understand that there's no additional name field for subports in the 
> registry and that they have the same hash. But I don't get how the additional 
> checking you introduced would prevent this from happening (I cannot speak the 
> details of tcl though). Neither I understand how only portfiles of these 15 
> out of ~130 ports that have subports/are subports were left in the registry. 
> Only thing that widly comes to mind — I haven't modified their portfiles 
> locally, but AFAIR of dependents on these while interrupting vim's editing 
> process, but again that would have meant leaving orphaned dirs for other 
> ports too.

Can I delete those rows safely?

Reply via email to