While going through PRs today, I discovered another group with a significant number of open PRs that might deserve its own tag.
Someone submits a patch with a perfectly functional port and then gets feedback like "please change the commit message format", "please squash commits / rebase / avoid merging" or "please replace tabs with spaces". Some might be a tiny bit less trivial, but they still fall under the category of "totally straightforward". And then some of those PRs might end up waiting for months before being merged. Such a PR would of course require some tag with a prefix "actionneeded:", but it's not clear to me whether we should necessarily assign that to the author or to any developer. Maybe something like "actionneeded:straightforward". Those would be PRs ideal for some rainy evenings when one is tired and just needs a distraction without too much of an intellectual input. And yes, we have a number of other PRs that could be qualified as work-in-progress, starting with "please don't merge this yet", which are more like "proofs-of-concept" / prototypes, requiring a non-trivial effort to finalize them. For many of those it's not really clear who's the one that could or should keep working on them. Mojca
