On Jan 09 09:40:23, [email protected] wrote: > https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl/ > > "Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general > use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. > Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API > or ABI stability.” > > If projects link statically against an SSL library, then BoringSSL maybe > fine, but probably not as a shared library used by many packages.
As opposed to a static library used by many packages?
