On 26 March 2018 at 14:03, Mojca Miklavec <[email protected]> wrote:
> (Resending the email since I initially posted from the wrong email address) > > Dear Abhishek, > > On 26 March 2018 at 08:00, Abhishek Kashyap wrote: > > Yes,I can totally ageee with you.But i focus more attention towards the > goal > > of the project almost from GSOC period.I am not doing for money instead i > > want to be part of open source. This will be my achivements.So please > view > > my proposals and suggest changes.Even i not able to contact my mentor.So > > that i can maximise the chance of accepting into GSOC. > > Thank You > > I did send you some feedback for which you have deliberately chosen to > argue against instead of doing it. > > And you did receive a very detailed reply from precisely one of two > people listed as a potential mentor. Do you want to say you did not > receive it? > No,till now there is no reply from mentors. > I have nothing to add to that, except that Ignoring the advice we gave > you in numerous email (including the plea to not send emails to > individual people, but keep discussion on the list, ignoring feedback > you receive etc.) will do anything but increase your chances to get > accepted. > > Mojca > > On 25 March 2018 at 23:38, Rainer Müller wrote: > > Hello Abhishek, > > > > On 2018-03-25 16:43, Abhishek Kashyap wrote: > >> I have drafted my proposals through GSOC portal.Please review it,give > >> feedback and suggest changes.As time is very less (only 2 days left) So > >> i hope you plase take steps soon as possible. > > > > Your proposal is well-structured and follows our template. However, you > > should be more careful with the English language and especially > punctuation. > > > > Let me go through the proposal and leave comments: > > > > Project Idea & Abstract > > > > The project idea section does not actually explain the project idea. > > > > You cannot say that you want "To make MacPorts efficient ,useful and > > popular". This would imply it is none of this at the moment. Also, how > > does your project help to reach that? > > > > In the abstract, the output of 'port selfupdate' is not relevant to your > > proposal. Why are you not even showing the message for unread items that > > would appear there? Why are you not demonstrating how 'port news' will > work? > I have updated these > > > > The goal needs to be made clear here. It is definitely not "to inform > > user about exact configuration changes that has been made after updating > > the port tree". Your goal is a mechanism to deliver announcements to > > users of MacPorts. These announcements are distributed along with the > > ports tree and can be read by users with a 'port news' command. > > > I have written as directed by you. > Now i am writing methodology.Guide me to do this and see the changes i > made. > Thank You
