On 2018-04-25, at 10:13 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > And if there's a need, we could of course define more levels of "how > closed" a port should be. This is another case where for a lot of > software updates are usually trivial, while for others it may break > your system (say, when software switches from C++98 to C++17 and > completely changes the API :), so the question of whether an update > counts as a trivial update probably varies wildly from one port to the > other.
Agreed. The silly little hedgewars game I maintain went from 0.9.23 to 0.9.24 and switched from qt4 to qt5 in the process :> The whole thing is broken in 0.9.24 until I do some major surgery. Anyone bumping that port by one single hundredths digit in the patch version is in for a HUGE surprise. Ken
