Hi So should I start working on the same database?
Community does not have any suggestions I guess. So should i go ahead with the existing structure? I had a doubt regarding version. How can i check the existing versions of any port. Say python27? Any list of maintainers i can get? Thanks On 9 May 2018 at 04:06, Vishnu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > And also i couldn't figure out any way to hide passwords/ Sensitive > information while creating app. > > Thanks > > On 9 May 2018 at 03:43, Vishnu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I had one doubt. >> Should i switch the link in heroku account for integration with macports >> github ? >> >> Because i think then you need to give accesss to heroku of your account. >> >> I think it would be wise for me to do the commit update in my local >> repository itself.. >> >> Once every 2 weeks or something ill push all the changes to macports >> repository. >> Do comment .What should be done? >> >> Thanks >> >> On 8 May 2018 at 11:40, Jackson Isaac <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Mojca Miklavec <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > On 8 May 2018 at 01:12, Vishnu wrote: >>> > > Hi >>> > > >>> > > I will work on all the points mentioned today.. >>> > > >>> > > But i have been trying many different ways. >>> > > To get 20k ports onto the database.. The site is crashing.. Timeout >>> error. >>> > > Or the site cant be reached. >>> > > Maximum i got till 9k ports successfully entered. >>> > > >>> > > Tried many ways.. >>> > > >>> > > If you have any suggestions do let me know. >>> > >>> >>> We can even try firebase for the DB backend and host the frontend on >>> heroku. >>> >>> Firebase free version gives 1GB of storage and 10GB of bandwidth per >>> month. >>> I guess for testing out the app on complete portindex we could give it a >>> try. >>> >>> https://firebase.google.com/pricing/ >>> >>> Then again we would have some kind of limitations over here in long run. >>> >>> > >>> > I was pretty sure that we would reach the database limit here. >>> > >>> > >>> > This site >>> > https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/heroku-postgres-plans >>> > says that the limit is 10k rows which is not anywhere near enough and >>> > fully consistent with your observation. The plan that lets you have >>> > 10M rows is 9 USD per month which I gladly pay if that would solve the >>> > issues (I'm not sure if those are the only ones, we might not have >>> > sufficient memory etc.) >>> > >>> >>> 9USD is only for the DB though. We might need to pay for the compute >>> separately. >>> >>> Looks like free VMs come with only 512MB RAM. >>> >>> > >>> > (I also remembered that I might have access to create a clean virtual >>> > machine, but I need a couple of days to physically reach a place where >>> > I have the additional info. That would require setting up the whole >>> > machine manually of course, but we need to do that for the final >>> > deployment anyway.) >>> > >>> > > I think i have to break the data entry in separate chunks and do it. >>> But not >>> > > sure how to do that. >>> > >>> > In any case Heroku will apparently not let you import the full >>> > database anyway until we switch to a payed account. If you still have >>> > troubles with performance issues afterwards, this also won't help. >>> > What you could do is temporarily copy or move a few folders (say, >>> > math, science and python) and run portindex just on those. This will >>> > give you a smaller number of ports to work with, but still sufficient >>> > to figure out what other issues you'll need to deal with (port listing >>> > will have to be paginated etc.) >>> > >>> > It's a good exercise to know what the limitations are. When you play >>> > with new features and database design, it's always easier to play >>> > with, say 10-100 ports than with full 15 MB portindex file. >>> > >>> >>> This plan sounds good. +1 >>> >>> -- >>> Jackson Isaac >>> >> >> >
