> I don’t understand the licensing requirements, but I find this to be a 
> convenient port for getting Mr. Sid support with the MacPorts gdal. I find it 
> useful and hope that it can remain as long as it is appropriate.

In any case, the support wouldn’t be removed. But, like I did with ECW API, 
MacPort’s official policy might force me to delete the port. You would then 
have to install the SDK manually in a predetermined place – thereby accepting 
the license – and the GDAL port variant would link against it.

V.

Reply via email to