Turns out I'm wrong, it will run 10.10+, but will only build from source on 10.13 due to a Xcode 9.4 requirement.
—Mark _______________________ Mark E. Anderson <[email protected]> On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 4:53 PM Chris Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > 10.13 only would be quite a harsh requirement, so I think limiting iTerm2 > to only that would not be good. > > Do you know why exactly they are doing this ? Is it the Metal 2 > requirement, or Xcode or something else ? Sometimes within MacPorts we can > support OSes beyond what upstream expects, as we have things like fallback > compilers etc., whilst upstream assumes you would only use Xcode supplied > ones. So it really depends on what the limitation actually is. > > Chris > > On 28 Jul 2018, at 9:10 pm, Mark Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: > > The upcoming 3.2 version of iTerm2 will require 10.13 or higher to build. > The upside is Metal 2 rendering is being working on. I'm wondering if we > want to keep older versions based on older macOSes or just say, hey, > upstream only supports 10.XX at the latest and so that's what we support. > > —Mark > _______________________ > Mark E. Anderson <[email protected]> > >
