Ah, right. I was just looking at http://packages.macports.org/clang-3.4/
And saw the last versions had a Darwin 9 PPC tarball. Are you saying it builds but does not function properly ? In any case, for now its not a big deal. GCC9 is a beta so things can easily change. Chris > On 29 Jul 2018, at 7:29 pm, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: > > clang does not work on PowerPC. > > >> On Jul 29, 2018, at 13:20, Christopher Jones <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Great thanks. >> >> I’m hopeful that libgcc is going to be OK, but if not please post a full log >> to the PR. >> >> It would be nice if libgcc-devel also built, but this is not so important at >> this point. I had to blacklist gcc-4.2 to get it to build on intel 10.6 (so >> fallback to MPs clang-3.4) but I am not sure what this blacklist will do on >> Darwin 9 PPC. It might try and fallback to a gcc build which will then cause >> problems with a dependency loop. I am hoping instead it also defaults to >> clang-3.4 (or we can convince it to). Its also true that gcc9/libgcc-devel >> is only a snapshot, so things might improve in before a final release (which >> is why right now I don’t think its a big deal). >> >> Chris >> >>> On 29 Jul 2018, at 7:12 pm, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Jul 29, 2018, at 11:32, Chris Jones wrote: >>>> >>>> Is there anyone who has a PPC machine running Darwin 9 (OSX 10.5) that >>>> would be willing to run a test of the PR >>>> >>>> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/2296 >>>> >>>> ? For the reasons outlined in the PR it would be useful to know if the >>>> port libgcc builds properly on this platform. I have tested the rest, 10.6 >>>> upwards, but Darwin 9 is one I don’t have access to. >>> >>> I'll give it a try! >>> >> >
