Hi, Is there a chance that we add a new cxx14 (and cxx17) PortGroup, at least as an intermediate step before a better solution is worked out.
I admit that I don't like zillion portgroup to achieve basically the same thing (cxx11 cxx14 cxx17 cxx20 ...), but what I like even less is every single Portfile randomly adding their own selection of blacklisted compilers, more often than not with lots of flaws, so it becomes impossible to tell after a while whether a compiler is in fact blacklisted because the software would not build with it (for whatever random reason) or because the author just accidentally blacklisted a compiler for which he thought it would not support C++14. And then there are cases when a ticket or pull request would be open for so long that some blacklisted compilers would already become obsolete/removed by the time the changes get merged :) :) :) I'm asking because Ryan just pointed out lots of flaws in compiler blacklisting. It looks as if every single port out of the three committed in the same batch had a different flaw in C++14 blacklisting. Mojca
