> That's one of things our existing 72-hour timeout period is for. It's not > specific to patchfiles; it's for any issue that the maintainer hasn't > responded to.
Okay, thanks Ryan :)
> That's one of things our existing 72-hour timeout period is for. It's not > specific to patchfiles; it's for any issue that the maintainer hasn't > responded to.
Okay, thanks Ryan :)