On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 15:44:58 +0100 Rainer Müller <[email protected]> wrote: > I would appreciate if we could try to find a compromise here as > well. As long as the variant is enabled by default, the contents and > functionality of the port will not change. Such a variant should > also not require much, if any, maintenance effort.
That was what the original pull request suggested, but the maintainer has rejected it. :( That said, it seems like a reasonable compromise to me. Perry -- Perry E. Metzger [email protected]
