Re: trying to understand the --no-exec activate option (on by default?)

[Rainer Müller]

On 29.11.18 11:08, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> I'm trying to understand how/where the activate --no-exec option is set, I 
> have the impression it's on by default.

To clarify the double negative here, the post-activate phase will be
executed by default.

Rainer