> Chris, > FYI, this has already been committed upstream. > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2019-10/msg00148.html > > Jack
Yes, this plan is coming along nicely -- some of us know how this came to pass :> I sent that link to Josh a while back when it came out, as support for passing the SYSROOT in base, so it's been floating around a while. After this, a couple of older gccs maybe, and then that covers most of our toolchain. Then we begin stripping all the baked-in -isysroot stuff out of installed ports, which is just plain bad. (And prevents, for example, reliably building against an alternate SDK, amongst other heartburn). Ken
