The gcc and postgresql ports are named correctly, both before and after their version numbering scheme changed. If llvm/clang's version numbering scheme changed, it would be good if the port names agreed with the scheme as well. I agree this has the potential to cause breakage which should be handled carefully.
- renaming llvm/clang/lldb from llvm-N.0 to llvm-N or llvmN ? Ken Cunningham
- Re: renaming llvm/clang/lldb from llvm-N.0 to llvm-N o... Chris Jones
- Re: renaming llvm/clang/lldb from llvm-N.0 to llvm-N o... Ryan Schmidt
- Re: renaming llvm/clang/lldb from llvm-N.0 to llvm... Chris Jones
- Re: renaming llvm/clang/lldb from llvm-N.0 to ... Ryan Schmidt
- Re: renaming llvm/clang/lldb from llvm-N.0... Ken Cunningham
