On Mon, 20 Apr 2020, Ken Cunningham wrote:
proposed new naming scheme for llvm & clang 10+ as prev discussed. explanation why in PR. Up to group, but will affect everything if it goes through. I'm fine either way, leave naming pattern as is or change it. Once in, no going back...see <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/60169>
I thought that the naming scheme change involved how the version suffixing is handled, but I don't see how that relates to the ticket referenced here.
Fred Wright
