> On 11 Dec 2020, at 7:23 pm, Christopher Nielsen <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> On 2020-12-11-F, at 14:16, Chris Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Just curious, but what exactly is the advantage of doing this ? I am not
>> sure i see what problem you are trying to solve that a single cache causes .
>>
>>>> On 11 Dec 2020, at 6:20 pm, Christopher Nielsen <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Is it possible to easily override the ccache directory via command-line,
>>> with the goal of maintaining separate caches per port?
>>>
>>> I did some quick digging through the MacPorts TCL files, and didn’t see
>>> support for such an override.
>>>
>>> My current solution — workable, though not ideal — is to update
>>> ‘ccache_dir’ in ~/.macports/macports.conf. That’s easily doable via a
>>> ‘port’ wrapper script.
>>>
>>> But assuming I didn’t miss anything, would folks be open to having the
>>> ability to specify ‘ccache_dir’ from the port command-line? If so, I’ll
>>> contribute the changes.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>
> In short, I’d like to maintain separate caches for ports I’m working on —
> Mame being the best example, as it takes at least an hour to build locally —
> without the cache being flooded by other ports. And preferably without
> resorting to custom ccache configuration, etc.
>
> Make sense?
Honestly, not really. Ccache can easily handle multiple concurrent builds to a
single cache directory, and you can trivially increase the size of the cache if
thats your problem, so I still don’t see what issue you are referring to by
‘being flooded by other ports’ as I don't see really what issue there would be
having build artefacts in a single cache for more than one port.