I also think this would be highly desirable. Would it be another portgroup that needs to be written in tcl?
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 11:01 AM Ken Cunningham < [email protected]> wrote: > With no plan, we’ll just keep getting more and more of these. > > <https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/9936> > > This kind of port just repackages the DMG into many tgz archives. > > It’s wasteful. People want them. > > What we should have instead of this is some kinda tech that > > 1. downloads the DMG > 2. installs the app > 3. records some way of uninstalling everything > > > What we have instead is a repackaging of the DMG into many, identical, > system-specific archive bundles. > > Yuk. > > Ken > >
