Oh, was license_noconflict supposed to be used with the name of a port? I thought it was supposed to specify a license that didn't conflict!
-- Jason Liu On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 6:35 PM Joshua Root <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2022-1-15 03:58 , Jason Liu wrote: > > I added a license_noconflict > > <https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/13641> to one of my > > portfiles a couple of days ago, and it appears that the builders are > > still flagging it as not distributable: > > > > "warzone2100" is not distributable because its license "gpl" conflicts > > with license "OpenSSL" of dependency "openssl11" > > > > Is it possible that the license_noconflict is being ignored? > > The Portfile says "license_noconflict openssl". It doesn't say > anything about openssl11. > > Looking at the explanation in the comment, it looks like you actually > mean "license_noconflict asciidoctor"? > > - Josh >
