Indeed, I keep openssh as a local port so I can get it updated w/o waiting for that problematic patch to be updated.
Marius -- Marius Schamschula > On Mar 15, 2022, at 4:12 PM, Daniel J. Luke <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 14, 2022, at 6:14 PM, grey <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thank you in advance for any wisdom you may be able to share on this issue! > > My suggestion previously was that the openssh port should just build upstream > openssh + any patches that a maintainer wants to keep updated - since > interest in forward-porting the gsskex and hpn patches always lags > (significantly) new openssh releases. > > If people want slowly-updated versions of openssh with one (or both) of those > patches, they can go in a different port so that the vast majority of users > can get the current version of openssh and it can be maintained by someone > who doesn't want/need/use those patches. > > -- > Daniel J. Luke >
