If PPC is fixed on our end, I will try to upstream patches, so we won’t need to 
carry those.
On Jan 17, 2023 21:47 +0800, Steven Smith <steve.t.sm...@gmail.com>, wrote:
> To clarify, the question is how to specify that these ports use the latest 
> stack version for builds on legacy systems. Does it work for pandoc now?
>
> stack on ppc or other very old non-supported systems will be extraordinarily 
> fragile and time-consuming, and I expect difficult to anticipate sustained 
> MacPorts support, especially as stack migrates to arm.
>
> > On Jan 17, 2023, at 08:39, Sergio Had <vital....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I assume stack-based builds are still broken for PPC, as well as Intel 
> > builds on 10.6.8, but I will try to find time to work on fixing it. Ken 
> > kindly shared his work on GHC for Snow Leopard, but it is for x86 (and not 
> > in Macports).
> >
> > If anyone is good at cross-compiling, please ping me. We need to first 
> > build the latest GHC on 10.6.8 Intel and then cross-compile GHC for PPC.
> > On Jan 17, 2023 06:15 +0800, Steven Smith <steve.t.sm...@gmail.com>, wrote:
> > > I recently added legacy-based support to pandoc, but I’m not sure that 
> > > the code I used is working. I’ll issue a revised PR based on any feedback 
> > > and use a working version for other GHC-based projects.
> > >
> > > I used this code to force stack-based builds on macOS versions that 
> > > predate Apple Silicon. After Apple Silicon, we need cabal-based builds 
> > > for native binaries.
> > >
> > > > set arm64_minimum_supported_major_version 20
> > > > if {${os.platform} eq {darwin}
> > > > && ${os.major} < ${arm64_minimum_supported_major_version}} {
> > > > # use stack to build x86_64 binaries
> > > > default_variants-append \
> > > > +stack
> > > > }
> > >
> > > stack-based stack builds work all the way back to Snow Leopard: 
> > > https://ports.macports.org/port/stack/details/. I’d expect the same of 
> > > pandoc, but it only builds back to Sierra: 
> > > https://ports.macports.org/port/pandoc/details/
> > >
> > > Is anyone able to suggest profile code that will accomplish this? Is this 
> > > related to the design choice to use a the port variant +stack to specify 
> > > the build tool?

Reply via email to