On 8/31/23 at 6:39 PM, Jason Liu wrote: > Does anyone have any objections if I were to resurrect Qt 5.10? One of the > ports that I am working on crashes under certain circumstances when using > qt511, which is the newest Qt that works on macOS 10.11. The version of Qt > that was bundled with the pre-built binary distribution was Qt 5.10. > Admittedly, I am also able to compile the port using qt59, and there are no > crashes. In addition, I can also compile the port using qt513 on macOS > 10.13, and there are also no crashes (qt512 also doesn't currently exist). > > I'm not really sure how much Qt changes with each version. So on the one > hand, it would be nice to be able to get the port working with the same > version of Qt that it originally shipped with, but on the other hand, it > seems like overkill to bring back such a large set of ports as qt510-* just > for the sake of a single port on old versions of macOS. > > What are everyone's thoughts on this? > > -- > Jason Liu
I think it would be much better to investigate the crash first. Do you have a crash report/have you reported the crash somewhere?
