Hi,

I am not sure what you are complaining about. Version  2.56.3, whilst not the 
absolute latest version a pretty up to date rust based version, is already used 
on Darwin 10 and newer. Your mail below seems to imply the old C version is 
used everywhere, which just isn't the case. What am I missing here ?

Chris

> On 10 Oct 2023, at 6:48 pm, Perry E. Metzger <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> See the following thread: 
> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/20744 — but to summarize, 
> Mascguy does not want to update librsvg to a safe / modern one because 
> ancient versions of MacOS can't support Rust.
> 
> So I don't want to be a pain in the neck, but I have little interest in 
> MacPorts if the point is to preserve compatibility with MacOS 10.5 at the 
> expense of having the thousands of users of current Macs and current MacOS 
> have a dangerously insecure version of a basic SVG graphics library that 
> other things depend on.
> 
> (The upstream librsvg maintainers have washed their hands of the old C 
> version and don't support it any more, and for good reason. The Rust version 
> of the library provides a far more secure codebase.)
> 
> I don't know how other people feel here, but I don't work on MacPorts because 
> I like retrocomputing, but rather because I want to use Unix tools on my 
> modern Macs.
> 
> If we're all on the same page that the priority is current MacOS users, then 
> we need to make sure that policy is well understood by all and we need to 
> update ports that are being held back for the benefit of people using an OS 
> from 2007.
> 
> If the consensus is that we prioritize ancient versions of MacOS with three 
> users (or sometimes none) over the experience the bulk of the users have, 
> that's fine, and I'll accept it, but then I'm switching to Brew, and I will 
> advise others to do the same, and will explain that current versions of 
> MacPorts cannot be trusted to have safe software because the people involved 
> prioritize support for ancient versions of the operating system.
> 
> I will accept whatever the consensus is.
> 
> Perry
> 
> 

Reply via email to