Well, that's frustrating. Now I'm sort of stuck... the build fails to
compile on my machine, but there's no way to force the buildbot to attempt
a build, because it already knows that it successfully completed a build
previously.

-- 
Jason Liu


On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 4:37 PM Joshua Root <[email protected]> wrote:

> "qt64-qtquick3d" is not distributable because its license "gpl"
> conflicts with license "APSL-2" of dependency "legacy-support"
>
> On 24/12/2025 07:41, Jason Liu wrote:
> > Wait, why is it being flagged as non-distributable? Packages for the
> > other macOS versions have been uploaded to packages.macports.org
> > <http://packages.macports.org> and are being distributed. Or is this
> > just a generic message, and the 10.14 package needs to be copied from
> > the private server to the public one?
> >
> > --
> > Jason Liu
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 3:20 PM Joshua Root <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >     On 24/12/2025 06:15, Jason Liu wrote:
> >      > According to the port health for the qt64-qtquick3d port <https://
> >      > ports.macports.org/port/qt64-qtquick3d/details/ <http://
> >     ports.macports.org/port/qt64-qtquick3d/details/>>, it has been built
> >      > successfully for Mojave. However, a package for 10.14 doesn't
> >     seem to
> >      > exist on packages.macports.org <http://packages.macports.org>
> >     <http://packages.macports.org/qt64- <http://packages.macports.org/
> >     qt64->
> >      > qtquick3d>, so my machine attempts to build the port from source
> >      > locally, and the build fails. Can someone try triggering a build
> >     on the
> >      > 10.14 buildbot to verify that the build does indeed complete, and
> >      > possibly put a pre-compiled binary up onto the packages server?
> >     <https://build.macports.org/builders/ports-10.14_x86_64-watcher/
> >     builds/84756/steps/subports/logs/stdio <https://build.macports.org/
> >     builders/ports-10.14_x86_64-watcher/builds/84756/steps/subports/
> >     logs/stdio>>
> >
> >     - Josh
> >
>
>

Reply via email to