Hi Marius,
On Dec 14, 2006, at 6:47 AM, Marius Schamschula wrote:
For what is worth,
As a longtime member of the octave mailing list, and as someone who
regularly builds octave without MacPorts or Fink, let me add the
current thinking about building octave under Mac OS X 10.4.x:
Apple's gcc 4.0.1 together with g95.org's g95 work well under both
PPC and Intel machines for building octave 2.9.9.
In my experience, gfortran has caused lots of problems.
Thanks for the information. I'll give g95 a spin.
Best Wishes,
Greg
On Dec 14, 2006, at 5:26 AM, Anthony Agelastos wrote:
On Dec 14, 2006, at 12:09 AM, Andy Kish wrote:
On Dec 13, 2006, at 6:00 PM, Gregory Wright wrote:
Yes, this is really necessary. The gcc40 port was built so you
would have a gfortran that is
ABI compatible with your gcc and g++. Apple does not supply
gfortran so MacPorts has to build it.
(And Octave really does have modules written in c, c++ and
fortran :-) )
Is gcc40 the standard port to depend upon when one needs a
fortran compiler? The reason for all the current py-scipy bugs on
trac is that the port doesn't install a fortran compiler as a
dependancy. I put up a patch for it, but told it to depend upon
gcc41. Should that be changed to gcc40?
I think it should be changed to gcc42 since gcc40 doesn't work on
Intel Macs (last time I checked). I hope this helps.
-Anthony
Thanks,
Andy
Marius
--
Marius Schamschula Webmaster
The Huntsville Macintosh Users Group
www.hmug.org
webmaster at hmug dot org marius at schamschula dot com
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
