*On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 17:03:06 +0200 * Anders F Björklund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> climbed out of the dark hell and cried out:
> CHENG Gao wrote: > >> Another example is apple-gcc. Tree has apple-gcc33 build 1819, and >> apple-gcc40 build 5363, while latest Tiger 10.4.10 has build 5367. >> Should they be updated? Or even apple-gcc33 be removed? > > Apple has not released the source code for Mac OS X 10.4.10 or > Xcode 2.4.1 (only 10.4.9 and 2.4.0), so gcc-5363 is the latest. > > gcc-3.3 is needed for Panther, which is still supported AFAIK... > (although that might change next week or something, with Leopard) Thanks for your explanation. I used wrong package as example. I dont suggest to remove apple-gcc in fact. I mean to clean up packages like tin-devel, which is definitely outdated. Another example is emacs-devel 22.0.97. With Emacs 22.1 released this package is outdated and may confuse users of macports. _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
