I don't see any point in supporting Pure Darwin for any reason at this point. You're talking about an installed base of what - 20 people? 50? 100 tops? I can think of more Amiga Unix users than that.
- Jordan On Feb 17, 2008, at 12:25 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Feb 17, 2008, at 01:40, Yves de Champlain wrote: > >> Le 08-02-16 à 22:26, Michael Franz a écrit : >> >>> I was able to install darwinports 1.3.2, but the port files have >>> properties/commands that this old version does not understand. >>> >>> The problem with building the latest version (This started with >>> Macports 1.5) is that Core Foundation is required. I would have >>> thought that darwin 8 had core foundation installed. >> >> and BTW many ports will also fail because they just suppose darwin to >> be mac os x > > We still have separate "macosx" and "darwin" platforms don't we? Do > we want to continue having that? Or should we drop all semblance of > Pure Darwin support? I guess if we (Anders) are going to all the > effort lately to support other operating systems, we should also > support Pure Darwin... > > _______________________________________________ > macports-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
