Adam Mercer wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:43, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Qt4 used to behave as you suggest. >> It was changed in r44200 >> (http://trac.macports.org/changeset/44200/trunk/dports/aqua/qt4-mac/Portfile). >> >> Some of the variants were removed because they were needed by other packages >> (r44200 lists them). >> >> In addition, having all these variants made the port much harder to maintain. > > Makes sense, I'm all for easy to maintain ports!
I don't see an explanation for why postgresql and mysql are needed in that revision or the linked tickets, though. Is it documented somewhere? - Josh _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
