On Feb 25, 2009, at 2:05 PM, Adam Byrtek wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 05:25, Scott Haneda <talkli...@newgeo.com>
wrote:
I have a feeling I am going to stand alone on this one, which is
fine, I
have no intention of pushing it, this was just to find out why this
was
chosen, and why it was not caught as in violation of suggested
layouts.
Scott, I think that in principle you are right. On the other hand I
can understand that many people are used to the current layout and if
the change is accepted, some reasonable migration strategy will have
to be prepared. Such migration shouldn't involve any manual work
and/or data loss.
Fully agree on that front. It was why I wondered if this was too
engrained in how it was done, it just may not be worth it. But, then
again, the move should be pretty simple, ports is sort of designed by
nature to fiddle with paths and move stuff around.
--
Scott
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
