On Mar 6, 2009, at 4:45 AM, David Evans wrote:
Andy Schmitt wrote:
I just compiled something that had expected to find: /lib/gtk-2.0/*/
loaders/libpixbufloader-bmp.so
Googling suggests that's a pretty common location for that folder
and that perhaps gdk-pixbuf was installed along with gtk2 as
recently as 2.8. But I had to manually install the gdk-pixbuf port
and adjust that path to /lib/gdk-pixbuf/loaders/libpixbufloader-
bmp.so.
So, did something change or did I manage to screw something up
somewhere along the way.
andy
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Andy --
I think you are mixing two different versions of gtk.
The gdk_pixbuf library is now included as part of gtk2 and bmp file
format is one of the default file types that can be loaded or
saved without using an external loader module. (also jpeg, png, ico at
least)
So wait, are you saying that /opt/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders
*should* be present after gtk2 is installed?
The command
gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders
will show you what additional external loader modules are installed
and
where. These are usually installed by other ports
to add support for their own file types.
That returned:
# Created by gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders from gtk+-2.14.7
# LoaderDir = /opt/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders
However, the "loaders" folder is noticeably absent.
The port gdk-pixbuf is an old version that is compatible with gtk1,
glib1 where it was a separate library and a loader module was required
for bmp.
Perhaps the application you are trying to build is a gtk1 application?
If you have port gdk-pixbuf installed then you also have its
dependencies installed gtk1, glib1.
I actually only installed gdk-pixbuf when I discovered ../loaders/
libpixbufloader-bmp.so was nowhere to found. So, yeah, I hadn't had
gtk1 and glib1 installed until gdk-pixbuf needed them to compile.
No it's gtk2. The application in question is NetRadiant- an attempt at
maintaining a reliable stabilized distribution of gtkRadiant 1.5,
since no others are being maintained. Rudolf Polzer has single-
handedly taken this on, but I don't think he has the resources to be
testing OS X builds. Historically most OS X Radiant SRC and binaries
needed/were built with the Fink tools and libraries. Long story short:
the current post-make scripts packs up the executables and dynamic
libraries into an .app, but they assumed Fink, and in particular /sw/
lib/gtk-2.0/*/loaders/libpixbufloader-bmp.so.
Try
port contents <portname>
to see what files have been installed for a given port.
Doing:
port contents gtk2
shows no sign of any of the libpixbufloader-xxx.so files
BTW does "port contents <name>" return what *was installed* with that
port or what *was supposed to have been installed*?
gtk1 and gtk2 can coexist without interfering with each other AFAIK.
(As
long as you don't link them together) ;-)
Dave
So, I don't know where that leaves me. Thanks for the informative
reply Dave.
andy
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
