On Apr 6, 2009, at 04:39 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Apr 5, 2009, at 09:04, Lenore Horner wrote:
Because of as yet unresolved Pango problems, I need to go back to
my previous installation of Gnucash. I attempted to do so, but
Gnucash complains about a symbol not existing in a dylib. So far
the only thing I've deactivated and reactivated the old version of
is Gnucash itself. Other things that successfully upgraded have
the new version active. Is this causing problems? If so, how do I
figure out where the problem is? I attempted to use port provides
to figure out where the "missing" dylib was coming from but as you
can see below, that didn't look in opt/ at all.
FWIW, this is exactly the same reason that the new Gnucash 2.2.9_1
won't run. Gnucash actually installs and activates despite the
Pango failure.
Any help appreciated.
Lenore
Details:
MLHPBG4:~ mlh$ port installed gnucash
The following ports are currently installed:
gnucash @2.2.8_0+no_x11+without_hbci+without_ofx+without_quotes
gnucash @2.2.9_1+no_x11+without_hbci+without_ofx+without_quotes
(active)
MLHPBG4:~ mlh$ sudo port deactivate gnucash 2.2.9_1
Password:
---> Deactivating gnucash
Error: port deactivate failed: Registry error: 2.2.9_1 not
registered as installed & active.
MLHPBG4:~ mlh$ sudo port deactivate [email protected]_1
Error: port deactivate failed: Registry error: gnucash not
registered as installed & active.
MLHPBG4:~ mlh$ port installed gnucash
The following ports are currently installed:
gnucash @2.2.8_0+no_x11+without_hbci+without_ofx+without_quotes
gnucash @2.2.9_1+no_x11+without_hbci+without_ofx+without_quotes
MLHPBG4:~ mlh$ sudo port activate [email protected]_0
Error: port activate failed: Registry error: gnucash 2.2.8_0 not
registered as installed.
MLHPBG4:~ mlh$ sudo port activate
[email protected]_0+no_x11+without_hbci+without_ofx+without_quotes
---> Activating gnucash @2.2.8_0+no_x11+without_hbci+without_ofx
+without_quotes
MLHPBG4:~ mlh$ gnucash
dyld: Symbol not found: _CGLGetCurrentContext
Referenced from: /System/Library/Frameworks/OpenGL.framework/
Versions/A/OpenGL
Expected in: /opt/local/lib/libGL.dylib
Trace/BPT trap
MLHPBG4:~ mlh$ port provides libGL
/Users/mlh/libGL does not exist.
You need to give "port provides" the full path of the file in
question.
$ port provides /opt/local/lib/libGL.dylib
/opt/local/lib/libGL.dylib is provided by: mesa
mesa was recently updated to a new version. Check "port installed
mesa" to see if you still have the old version around. If so,
deactivate the new version and activate the old one.
I haven't removed any of the deactivated ports myself, but I only have
one version of mesa around. That should mean it wasn't upgraded.
$ port installed mesa
The following ports are currently installed:
mesa @7.2_7+hw_render (active)
I tried to figure out where mesa came from.
$ port dependents mesa
mesa has no dependents!
So what installed mesa?
If I deactivate all my installed ports and then install the old
version of Gnucash, will that fix things, or will that only reactivate
the proper dependencies but not recompile them against their correct
dependencies?
Lenore
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
